Stata crosstab install#
It is available from the Statistical Software Components (SSC) archive and can be installed using the ssc install command in Stata: Since the estout package is not part of official Stata, you must install it before using it. We would not recommend running esttab until you are reasonably confident you've arrived at the results you want to publish.
Stata crosstab how to#
Most people will find it's easier to first obtain a set of (hopefully) final results and then work on how to present them. If you can get esttab to give you something close to what you want but are spending a lot of time trying to figure out how to get exactly what you want, consider just editing what you have. Much depends on how many tables you need to create, and how many numbers they contain. Be sure to consider the possibility that creating a particular table by hand may be quicker than using esttab. On the other hand, trying to figure out how to get esttab to give you the table you want can be time-consuming as well, and there's no guarantee it can make exactly the table you want. Keep in mind that you always have an alternative to using esttab: simply create the tables you want in Word or your favorite word processing program, copying and pasting the needed numbers from your Stata output. The ability to handle summary statistics and frequencies in addition to regression results is one of the reasons we elected to focus this article on esttab. We will also discuss estpost, which puts results like summary statistics in a form esttab can work with. The esttab command runs estout for you and handles many of the details estout requires, allowing you to create the most common tables relatively easily.
Stata crosstab full#
The estout command gives you full control over the table to be created, but flexibility requires complexity and estout is fairly difficult to use. In fact, esttab is just a "wrapper" for a command called estout. The esttab command is just one member of a family of commands, or package, called estout. Major topics for this article include creating tables of regression results, tables of summary statistics, and frequency tables. The esttab command takes the results of previous estimation or other commands, puts them in a publication-quality table, and then saves that table in a format you cause use directly in your paper such as RTF or LaTeX. This article will discuss esttab (think "estimates table") by Ben Jann.
Several Stata users have written programs that create publication-quality tables. However, they are not in the format or of the aesthetic quality normally used in publications. Pd.crosstab(,df.Stata's tables are, in general, clear and informative. We will calculate the cross table of subject, Exam and result as shown below
So the row table with row wise proportion will be The cross table is divided by row total to get the row wise proportion as shown below Two way frequency table : Get row wise proportion using crosstab() function So the cross table with column wise proportion will be The cross table is divided by column total to get the column wise proportion as shown below Two way frequency table : Get column wise proportion using crosstab() function So the cross table with proportion will be The cross table is divided by row total and column total to get the proportion as shown below Step 2: Get over all proportion of the frequency table The columns and index of the two way cross table is renamed to get the row total and column total as shown below To get the over all proportion lets first rename the two way cross table. STEP 1 : Rename to get row total and column total Two way frequency table or cross table: Get proportion using crosstab() function Margin=True displays the row wise and column wise sum of the cross table so the output will be Pd.crosstab(df.Subject, df.Result,margins=True) We will calculate the cross table of subject and result as shown below 'Mathematics','Mathematics','Mathematics','Science','Science','Science'], 'Subject':['Mathematics','Mathematics','Mathematics','Science','Science','Science',
0 kommentar(er)
